6 Juillet – Septembre 2013
Rectangle, Bruxelles

Love is The Ultimate Outlaw is inspired by Tom Robbins’ book, Still Life With Woodpecker. Tom Robbin wrote,
“Love is the ultimate outlaw. It just won’t adhere to any rules. The most any of us can do is to sign on as its accomplice. Instead of vowing to honor and obey, maybe we should swear to aid and abet. That would mean security is out of the question. The words “make” and “stay” become inappropriate. My love for you has no strings attached. I love you for free.”
Your Love Is Like A Chunk of Gold is a series of bread with crystal growth. The work is a juxtaposition of the real, the supernatural and science fiction.
The bread is a familiar item, a comfort food; the spiky crystal (instead of mold) growth made it strange and treacherous —The bread with crystal growth becomes an oxymoron object of familiarity and strangeness, comfort and pain similar to experiences of love and romance.
“Nothing could be more familiar than love. Nothing else eludes us so completely.” Jeanette Winterson
My work addresses the physical and metaphysical aspects of common objects and occurrences and in doing so, find poetic, sublime qualities that are in our ordinary existence. I observe two interior spaces —the domestic interior we physically inhabit and the interior space within us that is our spiritual, emotional and imaginative world— and how these two realms both reflect and have an effect on each other. I create visual representations of the eclipse of these two spaces.
My purpose is to examine the depths of ordinary existence and uncover the multi- faceted, multi-layered, multiple universes beyond the simplistic planes of realism and delusion. In giving consideration to objects or occurrences beyond their useful functions or mundane appearance, we cause awareness, sharpening our insights to see what is before us in each present moment —we experience the present tense.
Through observation, we raise consciousness in what we believe as reality, but really, is an illusion formed by our perceptions. So how do we negotiate the malleable quality of the physical dimension? How do we move through this world of shadows with awareness of its quality, lest we be consumed by the temporal? How can we change our perspective in order to change our experience? My work examines perception and experiential realms that are within and beyond the notion of logic.
Sookoon Ang
Sookoon Ang
Born 1977 in Singapore.
Lives and works in Paris.
Vernissage Jeudi 21 Mars 2013
Rectangle, Bruxelles
www.philippedurand.fr
www.laurentgodin.com
PRESS RELEASE
Melanie Bonajo vit et travaille à Amsterdam / Berlin. Son travail a été présenté dans des institutions artistiques internationales, telles que De Appel Arts Center / Amsterdam, Institut Neérlandais / Paris, Musée d’Art Moderne / Ljubljana, Kohun National Museum of Contemporary Art / Séoul, Stedelijk / Amsterdam, PPOW Galerie / Nouveau York, SMBA / Amsterdam, Programm, Berlin, Museum of Modern Art / Arnhem et mousse / Amsterdam.
En 2008, elle a étudié les sciences religieuses; mysticisme et l’ésotérisme occidental à l’UVA. En 2012, elle a lancé le Collectif international GÉNITALE qui se concentre sur des sujets autour de la participation, de l’égalité, de notre environnement et de la politique au-delà de la polarité.
Letter to the Cosmos,
I am interested in the paradoxes inherent in our future-based ideas of comfort and I explore the areas related to progress that remove from the individual a sense of belonging. Captivated by the spiritual emptiness of my generation, I examine people’s shifting relationship with nature and their connections to larger surroundings. I try to understand existential questions by looking at our domestic situation, idea’s around classification, concepts of home, attitudes towards value and how our technological advances and commodity-based pleasures increase feelings of alienation within the individual. Through my performances, photographs, videos and installations I explore the consequences of a mechanical and consumer-based society on our collective consciousness. I oppose the decline in human values and the loss of connection amongst people who, are no longer rooted in the unified outlook of tradition, religious or spiritual; but see the world through the eyes of a crass materialism, scientism, and positivism. I question the role and importance of reason in human life, its connection to feeling and the human race’s general view of itself in relation to the physical universe.
Spirit
I am interested in the desacralization processes applied by modern science and the consequences which flow out of these secular principles: our loss of place in a giant, cold and disconnected cosmos. I focus on themes of detachment and loneliness of the Western individual who lives his / her life separated from nature and the senses, disconnected from a memory of something wild and ancient, buried deep within ourselves.
The concept of God interests me alongside traces within historical development of those religious traditions which have rejected a world view based on the primacy of pure rationality or doctrinal faith, emphasizing instead the importance of inner enlightenment or gnosis: a revelatory experience which was typically believed to entail an encounter with one’s true self as well as with the ground of being, God.
Nature
Sensitive to contemporary environmental concerns, I address the importance of a change in attitude towards the natural. A sensitive awareness of something bigger than ourselves is an important presence that has vanished from our daily consciousness. Through publications and by organizing participations, happenings and music, I try to create a less commercial spirit of togetherness. I attempt to offer new meaning and regain the loss of connection people have to each other, their surroundings and themselves.
I question our myth of progress by discussing our shifting relationship to nature. The situation in which we find ourselves today is unique regarding the magnitude and rate of growth of the human enterprise. We are destroying our natural environment at a constantly increasing pace, and in doing so we are undermining the preconditions of our own existence. In this regard, humans act irrationally. Our greed and increased material benefits, benefits that may well exceed the human population’s vital requirements, creates huge problems for the other inhabitants on this spaceship called Earth*.(*Buckminister Fuller) My concerns for and attraction to the natural world is a direct consequence of growing up in a cultivated place like the Netherlands, where development has impeded nature of its path. Growing up in a country where every tree has been planted by human hands, my idea of nature has always been encapsulated in some sort of exotic dream, far away and unreachable. My ideas about nature are surrounded by a fictional dream world and are influenced by Disney‘s holistic views on the natural world. Through this fictional space an opening which pinpoints towards similarities instead of opposites can be experienced.
Process
The construction of every project is a creative, nonlinear process. It is a dynamic dialogue with my physical and social environment. It is about a translation of an intention in > form, image, arrangements or sound to create an awareness. But most of all to project a kind of feeling, something with an emotional connection and resonance beyond just mental processes. I favor inconsistent elements in stories to address the relativity of our perception. They are small commentaries on the instability of the ideas and ideals that shape our way of life. I am moving with my work and subjects toward a more comprehensive knowledge of the connections between spiritual and biological life.
I wish to draw attention to one of the most immediate approaches to the world of inner experience and erase the rigid dichotomy between science and mysticism. By re-arranging various methodologies inspired by anthropology, nature, consumer culture, and the mundane.
I put established norms of moral, spiritual and social order on trial. I am searching for the purest and clearest depiction of processes and change. Through humor and the absurd I touch upon the borders of our belief systems and search for an attitude that encourages new perspectives towards consciousness, value, the structural and ethical questions of ownership, the body, each other, nature and economic approaches.
For example ‘86 details of Paradise’ looks into value, the market and the details of an alternative economic structure by addressing the aspect of giving material goods away without explicit agreement for immediate or future rewards as a substitute for market or trade economy. The installation ‘C-meter Prototype 01’ is a device, developed and placed within a pyramid like structure to reveal how our unperceptive sensory state influences our mental understanding of our environment.‘The herstories of the social naked body’ investigates how particular artistic, social and political issues of the general social body intertwine with the ideology of nudism. Definitions of male and female are dissolved as they appear not to exist outside their social construct.
Culture
I am interested in how people organize themselves through their cultures, especially traditional ones. To understand these cultural processes I have travelled a great deal to spend time with various indigenous people. I learned from their ways of being, their connection with each other, their spirit world and the earth. The unifying notion among all these cultures is that nature is a sensitive ecological system of which humans are part and must understand their place. The insignificance of human traces that are revealed when human construction and endeavors has ceased but nature continuous its work are an important aspect of my work. Researching and trying to understand the edge of belief systems and its parallels, I have visited rare places on this planet who are still on the bridge of time. They linger between traditional and global culture, are still connected to the past, but at the same time presented with the future to come, such as Amazonia, East-Greenland, Burma, India, Australian aboriginal communities and Tibet. In these regions traditional wisdom, life-style and craft are still practiced. These places have become scarse and hard to find on this planet. Mostly they exist, because they are difficult to reach, not of any economic interest for Western dominating culture, are involved in some extreme totalitarian regime or are occupied. Because of my interest in parallel believe systems and experiencing so many different ways that people relate to the basic concerns of human life, each other and the environment, the idea of looking at reality as a fixed concept has become completely absurd to me. Reality is something unattainable and distant, but which can be experienced and understood, perhaps some moments, when looking through your eyelashes.
In the Modern age, contemporary religions and science have failed to provide many people with a religious outlook that can give them a sense of meaning and connection. It seems that only modern human beings have come to a point where they no longer know why they exist. Thinking in terms of the separateness of mind and body has shown serious effect that constricts freedom in human life and is perhaps destructive to all life on the planet. Ecologists have suggested that our environment is suffering from the notion that body (in this case, the body of the earth) is not of central importance. They argue that the portion of the Western philosophical tradition that favors reductionism is in part responsible for the physical abuse that we have heaped on our planet and its plants and animals. We will see in the near future if the earth does belongs to humans, or humans still belong to the earth.
The object
I am interested in things without status and which carry a certain invisibility around them. Those things one cannot really sell. Domestic objects affect me through their modesty.
I see our domestic landscape as a reflection of our inner architecture. It also serves as a good starting point for cultural change. In my installations I attempt to make a connection between the lowest and the highs principles. For example, by positioning household objects in geometric patterns referring to cosmic maps I try to link simplicity and complexity. A recognition can take place in ordinary dignity; the accidentally miraculous. Or it can be a meditation on what happens when nothing happens. The protagonists of our everyday life: domestic materials which are simple, everyday things become indicators of a mental archaeology that connects the mundane with the metaphysical.
Excavating the site can engage the viewer on a wandering journey that can unravel a reservoir of possible meanings. Through these processes of transformation I try to point out the interconnectedness and significance of all that is, especially in relation to commodity items. Once an object is made, someone has responsibly over its existence.
Why we clutter ourselves with so much stuff is a huge enigma for me. Do we need to keep filling our emptiness with objects? Various performative positions may suggest a correspondence to the mental homelessness that we as capitalists experience as we rely more and more on objects to construct our sense of identity, place and belonging, something that in turn makes us more dependent on our material attachment to the system. What would happen if the social masks of necessity were removed?
The Body
“To think of touch epistemologically requires that we put the sentient body at the center of our knowing. While New Age philosophers, massage therapists, dancers, and yoga practitioners (among others) have long recognized the centrality of the sensuous body in ways of knowing, intellectuals and other so-called sophisticated thinkers have often ignored or undervalued the body as a source of knowledge.” (Peggy Phelan).
Because shifting perception is not merely a question of turning the tables and changing language, I have recently begun to focus more on art as a participatory act. In order to eliminate the passive gaze I needed to create a statement that would allow a physical entrance.
I needed to utilize shared collective energy in order to form transformative acts. A lot of fieldwork is still ahead of us in the dualistic view of the mind/body connection. Distinguishing binaries such as spirit/matter and male activity/intellect/mind/spirit to female passivity/the body/senses/feeling, I have worked to solidify characteristics and categorizations. By organizing participations I try to unblock those conditions from their social cement and try to reverse archetypes perceived as weakness to strengths in both sexes.
For example giving without taking (archetypically representing motherhood, love without judgment) as a modest approach towards a new economy where welfare can be distributed more equally. By giving collectively guidance and voice to strong emotions such as; sadness or grief one can perhaps heal a part of him / herself and become a more whole person, who has more peace and space for others.
Equalism
The objectification of any living thing decreases human dignity and the potential of our inner quality. Objectification creates holes in the well-being of the other. We need to put this in perspective regarding the objectification of women, animals, the other, but also as it relates to our thoughts, feelings, the elements and our planet.
The urgency of our time requires us to ask for active negotiations and re-definitions of our conceptual boundaries that have been based on polarity. In order to talk about the future shape of technology, value, recourses and the extinction of many animals who we all grew up with, we need to redirect our emphasis on the symbolic, the metaphor and the story through personal experience over the objective analysis.
The female body is still used to sell all kinds of unnecessary goods. Furthermore, what do the object for sale have to do with a woman or her body? I can hear you say, “Do we have to talk about feminism again? Yes, but for now I will focus on a collective I initiated called GENITAL INTERNATIONAL.
GENITAL INTERNATIONAL mocks corporate identity by marketing the unmarketable. It shows how the much undervalued bodies of both women and men can give rise to all (so-called) higher intellectual activity, and how sharing the processes of a new symbol creation can build a sense of community.
GENITAL INTERNATIONAL diverts the attention from the artist as an individual genius to anonymous creators and change art market sales into a system of donation and service. Visual-based contemporary art puts itself on a pedestal and often excludes other practices of art from the scene. This is a platform where academics, scientists, poets, writers, philosophers, musicians, believers, dancers, cooks and more meet in dialogue with each other in order to create a work of art and together work on the cultural frontiers This will take place in the shape in workshops, participations and publications.
oɾɐuoq ǝıuɐlǝɯ
Melanie Bonajo
Born 1978 in Netherlands.
Lives and works in Amsterdam.
Black waste found after the destruction of the facade of a Brussels building, the one in which the artist works, was that of his studio; frontage crumbs of which the artist collected the bits with as much precaution as if they had been pieces of meteorites that fell out of the sky. He scans fragments of them and observes them so closely that one can no longer distinguish what they really are; the projected image, which unfolds elsewhere.
Not far from here, a crystal-clear photograph where one could still feel the beating heart of this freshly caught fish; the minute that follows, he will be put back into the water, dropped off in the source after a brief moment of communion in the hand of the friend already aware that the animal runs through his fingers.
The events and the materials impose themselves on the artist. The arrangements he consequently put in place, reflect this surprise, create new connections, poetically reveal these layers of time and meaning.
Music is played on the radio while the artist is working on his piece. Pharoah Sanders plays “The Creator has a Masterplan”.
Des débris de carrelage noirs trouvés suite à la destruction de la façade d’un immeuble bruxellois, celui dans lequel l’artiste travaille, celui de son atelier; devanture en miettes dont l’artiste collecte les éclats avec autant de précaution que s’ils avaient été des morceaux de météorites projetés hors du ciel. Il en scanne des fragments et les observe de si près qu’on ne distingue plus de quoi il s’agit réellement; l’image projetée, un ailleurs se déploie.
Non loin, une photographie d’une netteté cristalline où l’on sentirait encore le coeur battre de ce poisson fraîchement pêché; la minute qui suit, il sera remis à l’eau, déposé dans la source après un bref instant de communion dans la main de l’ami conscient déjà que l’animal lui file entre les doigts.
Les évènements et les matériaux s’imposent à l’artiste. Les agencements qu’il met ensuite en place témoignent de cette surprise, créent de nouvelles connexions, révèlent de façon poétique ces couches de temps et de sens.
Une musique passe à la radio alors que l’artiste travaille à son oeuvre. Pharoah Sanders joue “The Creator has a Masterplan”.
Zwart puin gevonden na de deconstructie van de voorgevel van een gebouw in Brussel, waarin de kunstenaar werkt, was van zijn studio; delen van de gevel waarvan de kunstenaar de stukjes bij elkaar raapte met zoveel precisie alsof het stukjes meteoriet waren die uit de lucht vielen. Hij scant fragmenten hiervan en observeert ze zo nauwkeurig dat men niet werkelijk weet waar het om gaat; het geprojecteerde beeld, ontvouwt ergens anders.
Niet ver weg, een glasheldere foto waar je nog steeds het kloppende hart van deze vers gevangen vis zou voelen, in de minuut die volgt, zal deze weer te water worden gelaten, terug in de bron na een kort moment van communie in de hand van de vriend, zich bewust van het bewegende dier tussen zijn vingers.
De evenementen en materialen dringen zich op aan de kunstenaar. De regelingen die hij vervolgens invoert, getuigen van deze verrassing, creëren nieuwe banden, ontvouwen op poëtische wijze deze lagen van tijd en betekenis.
Terwijl de kunstenaar werkt aan zijn project speelt de muziek op de radio. Pharoah Sanders speelt “The Creator has a Masterplan”.
Martin Belou
Born 1986 in France.
Lives and works in Marseille.
Geronimo has, as they say, done it by himself.
Far from having the legendary charisma of a Cochise or even of a Victorio, he rose through the ranks of the Chiricahua community and faced the reproaches with which every passionate warrior who, after numerous failures wiped in mindless adventures and false promises, persisted in an attitude likely to put the tribe in danger.
His attitude disregarded the caste of the leaders and their heredity.
In the months that followed after the massacre of his family in János, the young man mourned forever in the depths of his being and was sent as an emissary to visit leaders like Juh, Cochise and many other rancherías where he met the four Chiricahuas groups.
The chiefs, having realized that he had lost most of his family during the tragedy, allowed the one who was still Goyathley to prepare himself and then to organize the vengeance.
He was seen busy for months recruiting warriors, he knew how to convince them while making them sought vengeance with him.
A single watchword reigned then: ” The war, the war, the war!!! “
At the end of the fight of which the Apaches came out victorious, Goyathley received his name from the Mexicans screaming in terror: Beware, beware, Geronimo!
He had just killed a large number of them on the day, it seems, that … Saint Jerome was there, on September 30th! As for the year, it appears out that these events took place in 1851.
The Mexicans shouted that name with terror; Goyathley’s companions heard him and resumed him in chorus of victory. It was a sign, a designation.
Goyathley was to become Geronimo.
Geronimo s’est, comme on dit, fait tout seul.
Loin d’avoir le charisme légendaire d’un Cochise ou même d’un Victorio, il a grimpé les échelons de la société Chiricahua et fait face aux reproches dont était accablé tout guerrier impétueux qui, après de nombreux échecs essuyés dans des aventures irréfléchies et sans lendemain, persistait dans une attitude de nature à mettre la tribu en danger. Il a fait fi de la caste des chefs et de leur hérédité.
Dans les mois qui suivirent le massacre de sa famille à Janos, le jeune homme endeuillé pour toujours aux tréfonds de son être fut envoyé comme émissaire chez Juh, chez Cochise et dans bien d’autres rancherias. Il s’adressa aux Chiricahuas des quatres bandes.
Les chefs, ayant reconnu que c’était lui qui avait perdu le plus de membres de sa famille au cours du drame, autorisaient celui qui était encore Goyathley à préparer puis organiser la vengeance. On le vit des mois durant recruter les guerriers, sachant les convaincre tout en leur faisant crier vengeance avec lui.
Un seul mot d’ordre régna alors en apacheria : ” La guerre, la guerre, la guerre !!! “
A l’issue du combat dont les Apaches sortirent victorieux, Goyathley reçut son nom des Mexicains hurlant de terreur : Cuidado, cuidado, Jeronimo ! Il venait d’en tuer un grand nombre le jour, semble-t-il, de… la Saint Jérome qui la-bas avait lieu le 30 Septembre ! Pour ce qui concerne l’année, il s’avère que ces évènements eurent lieu en 1851. Les Mexicains hurlèrent de terreur ce nom; les compagnons de Goyathley l’entendirent et le reprirent en choeur dans la fièvre de la victoire. C’était un signe, une désignation. Goyathley devait devenir Geronimo.
Extrait du livre Geronimo par Olivier Delavault.
Geronimo heeft het, zoals ze zeggen, alleen gedaan.
Verre van het hebben van het legendarische charisma van een Cochise of zelfs van een Victoriaanse, beklom hij de ladder van de Chiricahua-gemeenschap en werd hij geconfronteerd met de verwijten waarmee elke onstuimige krijger te maken kreeg die, na vele mislukkingen in onnadenkende avonturen en loze beloftes had, volhardde in een houding van een aard die de stam in gevaar zou brengen.
Hij negeerde de kaste van stamhoofden en hun erfenis.
In de maanden die volgden op het bloedbad van zijn familie in Janos werd de jongeman, rouwend voor altijd in de diepten van zijn wezen, gestuurd als een afgezant naar Juh, Cochise en vele andere stammen. Hij ontmoette de vier Chiricahuas groepen.
De leiders, die erkenden dat hij het grootste deel van zijn familie had verloren tijdens de tragedie, stelden de persoon die nog steeds Goyathley was in staat zich voor te bereiden en vervolgens de wraakactie te organiseren.
Hij was maandenlang bezig met het rekruteren van strijders, hij wist hoe hij hen moest overtuigen terwijl hij hen ertoe bewoog wraak te nemen.
Een enkel motto regeerde toen in Apacheria: “ De oorlog, de oorlog, de oorlog!!! ”
Aan het einde van het gevecht waarbij de Apaches als overwinnaars uitkwamen, ontving Goyathley zijn naam van de Mexicanen die schreeuwden van schrik: Pas op, pas op, Geronimo!
Hij had net een groot aantal van hen gedood gedurende de dag, naar het schijnt, waarop de Heilige Jerome er was, op 30 september! Wat het jaar betreft, lijkt het erop dat deze gebeurtenissen plaatsvonden in 1851.
De Mexicanen schreeuwden die naam met angst; Goyathley’s metgezellen hoorden hem en hervatten hem in een koor van de overwinning. Het was een teken, een aanduiding.
Goyathley zou Geronimo worden.
Geronimo by Olivier Delavault
Editor: Folio Biographie
https://blog-histoire.fr/2000-ans-histoire/1812-geronimo.html
14 juin – 31 aout 2012
Rectangle, Bruxelles
The image is a screenshot taken while watching Sydne Lumet’s Equus (1977). While the film was playing there was a bug, the image is neither “made-up” nor the object of digital manipulation. The point of this shot at this instant is in the demonstration of the limits of technology and this case, it’s wear. If understanding the image becomes confusing because of it, it also allows other interpretations.
It’s the juxtaposition of two offset scenes, of which one seems to be sketched, that being of interest to the artist. The movement that is set in the image seems to indicate that something is going to happen, even if this is the smallest of things. Here, the movement is decomposed, yet nothing indicates the presence of a before or an after. This brings us back to the question of the “pregnant instant”, the time of the scene’s length that is at the same time zero as well as set in a duration of time. For Gilles Deleuze, that is the “real present”, “the emergence of logic”. The subtitle participates in this: it makes the image resonate (as well as the characters), thus giving it back its photogram quality.
Colette Dubois
L’image est une capture d’écran prise pendant le visionnage du film de Sydney Lumet, Equus (1977). Il s’agit d’un bug pendant la lecture, l’image n’est donc ni ‘maquillée’, ni objet d’une manipulation numérique. L’intérêt de la saisie de cet ‘instant’ tient dans ce qu’il expose les limites d’une technologie et dans ce cas, son usure. Si la compréhension de l’image en devient confuse, en revanche, elle ouvre à d’autres interprétations.
C’est la juxtaposition de deux plans décalés dont l’un semble seulement esquissé qui intéresse l’artiste. Le mouvement fixé à l’image semble indiquer que quelque chose va advenir, même si cette chose est infime. Ici, le mouvement est décomposé, pourtant rien ne nous indique la présence d’un avant ou d’un après. Ce qui rejoint la question de ‹l’instant prégnant›, celui du temps que dure la scène qui doit être en même temps nul et s’inscrire dans la durée. Pour Gilles Deleuze, il s’agit du «vrai présent», «l’émergence du sens». Le sous-titre y participe: il fait résonner l’image (ainsi que les personnages) et par là, il lui restitue sa qualité de photogramme.
Colette Dubois
Het beeld is een schermafbeelding die gemaakt is tijdens het kijken van Sydne Lumet’s Equus (1977). Terwijl de film aan het spelen was ontstond er een storing. Het beeld is noch ‘gefabriceerd’, noch het resultaat van digitale manipulatie. Het belang van het vastleggen van dit ‘moment’ is dat het de grenzen van een technologie blootlegt en in dit geval, zijn slijtage. Als het begrijpen van het beeld verwarring veroorzaakt, stelt het zich daarentegen ook open voor andere interpretaties.
Het is de juxtapositie van de twee verschoven vlakken, waarvan er slechts één geschetst lijkt te zijn, wat de kunstenaar interesseert. De beweging die aan het beeld gekoppeld is lijkt erop te wijzen dat er iets gaat gebeuren, zelfs als dit iets kleins zou zijn. Hier is de beweging onderbroken, maar niets wijst op de aanwezigheid van een voor of een na. Dit brengt ons terug naar de vraag van het “zwangere moment”, die in de tijd dat de scène zich afspeelt, op hetzelfde moment zowel nul moet zijn als voort moet duren. Voor Gilles Deleuze, is dat het “echte aanwezige”, “het ontstaan van betekenis”. De ondertitel maakt hier deel van uit: het laat de afbeelding resoneren (evenals de personages) en herstelt daarmee de kwaliteit van de fotogram.
Colette Dubois
Pierre-Pol Lecouturier
Born 1981 in France.
Lives and works in Brussels.
Equus, 1977
Directed by Sidney Lumet
Produced by Elliott Kastner, Lester Persky, Denis Holt
Screenplay by Peter Shaffer
Based on Equus
by Peter Shaffer
Starring Richard Burton, Peter Firth, Jenny Agutter, Joan Plowright, Colin Blakely